The #1 Project Management Software For Teams
Grade: A — Score: 100/100
Hive leverages advanced technology to integrate various tools, allowing teams to manage their projects seamlessly in one platform. With features like AI-driven task management and customizable project views, Hive enhances productivity and efficiency.
The platform supports diverse workflows, enabling users to visualize their tasks through multiple formats such as Gantt charts, Kanban boards, and timelines. This flexibility helps teams adapt their project management style to their specific needs.
By minimizing the risks associated with project management, Hive offers a zero-risk adoption guarantee and ensures that teams can focus on their core activities without the hassle of managing multiple tools.
Free: $0/month
Starter: $5/user/month
Teams: $12/user/month
Enterprise: Custom pricing
Buzz AI Add-On: $12/user/month
Consider switching to Asana: Asana offers similar project management capabilities but may lack Hive's unique AI features.
Hive and Asana both handle project and task management, but Hive is more all-in-one around project views, notes, chat, proofing, approvals, time tracking, automations, and Buzz AI in the same workspace. Asana is usually stronger for teams that want structured cross-functional project governance, goals, portfolios, and mature task dependencies. Hive is the closer fit when collaboration and execution need to live inside one project workspace rather than across several connected apps.
Hive and ClickUp are both broad productivity platforms, but ClickUp is usually the more feature-dense option with docs, whiteboards, goals, dashboards, and many configuration layers. Hive is a better fit for teams that want project views, native communication, proofing, time tracking, approvals, forms, and Buzz AI without as much setup complexity. Buyers should compare ClickUp closely if they want one very configurable system for many departments.
Hive is more directly centered on project delivery, collaboration, proofing, time tracking, and AI-assisted work management. Monday.com is usually evaluated as a broader work OS for building no-code workflows across sales, marketing, operations, service, and internal processes. Hive is the cleaner fit when the core problem is managing projects and approvals, while Monday.com may fit better when the buyer wants highly configurable workflow apps.
Hive and Wrike both serve teams that need work management, project tracking, approvals, and reporting. Wrike is often compared for larger organizations that need advanced governance, request intake, resource planning, and marketing operations controls. Hive is more compact for teams that want project views, collaboration, proofing, time tracking, and Buzz AI in one workspace with clearer public entry pricing.
Yes. Hive is a strong fit for creative agencies and marketing teams because it combines project views, proofing, approvals, notes, chat, forms, time tracking, and reporting in one workspace. Its proofing and approvals workflow is especially relevant for teams reviewing images, documents, and creative assets. Agencies should still confirm whether Hive's client access, reporting, and billing workflows match how they manage retainers or project-based work.
Yes. Hive documents proofing and approvals for faster review cycles, fewer approval rounds, and tracking who approved what and when. The finalized feature data also includes proofing and approvals as a key feature for creative, marketing, and agency workflows. This makes Hive more relevant than a basic task manager when teams need asset feedback and approval routing.
Buzz AI can help create projects and actions, restructure projects, summarize meetings, search workspace context, draft content, update work items, coordinate email, and automate workflow requests. Hive says Buzz respects workspace permissions, logs activity for audit review, and does not train models on workspace data. Teams should treat Buzz as an AI assistant inside Hive workflows, not as a standalone general-purpose AI tool.
Yes. Hive includes time tracking, timesheets, workload planning, team resourcing, project reporting, and portfolio-style visibility in the finalized feature data. The Teams plan is the main public plan for time tracking because it adds time tracking, portfolios, team sharing, custom fields, labels, statuses, and automation allocation. This makes Hive relevant for agencies and operations teams that need to track capacity as well as task status.
Yes. Hive's finalized integrations include Slack, Zoom, Google Calendar, GitHub, Salesforce, Gong, Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, OneDrive, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Zapier, HubSpot, and Outlook. Hive also publishes REST API documentation for teams that need programmatic access. Integration depth should still be checked against the exact workflow, because a listed integration does not always mean every field or action is supported.
Hive can work for small teams, especially because it has a free plan and a Starter plan at $5/user/month, but it may be more platform than needed for very simple task lists. Small teams get the most value when they use several parts of the workspace, such as project views, notes, chat, calendar, forms, proofing, time tracking, and automations. If the only need is a lightweight personal task board, a simpler tool may be easier.
How AI agents (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, others) read this review page in the past 7 days. Updated weekly. View Hive AI Visibility Report.